Wave-Particle Duality

Largest Molecules Yet Behave Like Waves in Quantum Double-Slit Experiment

There is a fairly easy theory for this that I’ve never seen anyone else bring up:

1) The electron/molecule at point A is not the same electron/molecule at point B. It does not move from A to B, it is continuously displaced from point A to point B creating the illusion of movement. Much like the lights on a marquee appear to move, but the bulbs don’t actually change place. (which is also why Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is wrongly applied in quantum phsyics. no movement of a single particle, no “system”, no correlation between location and speed. His theory isn’t wrong in general about an actual complete “system”, it just doesn’t apply here. They don’t even quote his actual theory correctly anymore, just the misinterpretation of it as it relates to electrons and other particles.)

2) Newtonian physics actually does hold in quantum mechanics. The equal and opposite reaction for forward momentum in time is moving Backwards in time. (There is probably also an equal and opposite reaction interdimensionally that creates an anti-particle with each particle we see, which cancel each other out after the fraction of a moment the particle we see exists…or what we perceive to see may be both offsetting particles at once) I know it sounds kind of bizarre. It would explain why wave cancellation happens as this article points out. If we have to Pull the opposite reaction from the future as we push one into the future, then wave cancellation would create a situation where the future somehow knows it doesn’t need two offsetting backwards reactions. It would also explain why something in the present (the slit experiment) would alter where the energy was able to be Pulled from in the future, not just where the energy is able to be pushed To from the present.

It explains a lot more than just this slit experiment. Okay, maybe it isn’t that simple to describe concisely really. Understanding this will be the key to breaking the perceived speed of light, as I think Einstein had that barrier wrong.

3 thoughts on “Wave-Particle Duality”

  1. A Little Fear & Loathing With Wavicles.

    By golly somebody is getting this. {You’ll have to remember I taught Physics for Electronics and was a Siemens field service engineer for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy & Imaging systems; I wasn’t a paratrooper all my life}

    Is water a drop (particle) or a wave (in the ocean)? Light, photons are gamma particles of both visible and non/infra/ultra-visible frequency spectrums. Photons, although individual gamma particles, travel in waves of Energy just like water in the Ocean millions at at time. That light bulb in your room is emitting 250,000,000 photons per inch of filament per tera-second in waves of gamma particles spreading out to illuminate your whole room.

    The “Physics” Experiments are “contaminated” because nobody has yet taken into account for the “ambient background” electromagnetic particle soup of trillions of non-visible (to the experimenters naked eye) gamma particles inherent in the room, reflecting off every surface (made of atoms) in the room like a trillion harmonic waves of “Pong” pucks. The soup of gamma particles don’t magically disappear when you turn off the bulb, the Energy of their interacting waves change to a “Calm Sea.”

    We literally live in a soup of non-visible gamma particles and waves that are present even when you turn out the lights and blacken the room for your silly experiments that amount to shooting one (photon) billiard ball through an ambient background asteroid belt of reflecting (photon) billiard balls (criss-crossing waves of gamma particles). Some of your experimental straight-line photons are going to get statistically knocked off their path by ambient background gamma particles.

    Experiment: Bring somebody into the room with you at Night with all the lights Off with only your monitor as a light source, and move around and stand at different angles to view these words on your monitor. No matter what angle the both of you stand, as long as you can “see to read” the monitor screen you are perceiving “waves” of light photon gamma particles being emitted by these very character symbols at about 250,000,000 photons (particles) to the inch, per (say) tera-second of time, and those photon particles are traveling outwards from your monitor screen in spherical “wave(s)” at every possible angle you have been able to move around the room to observe.

    You are witnessing these word/letter/character/photon/gamma particle wave/light streams that your mind is interpreting into your conscious thought approximating what I’m typing here, crossing the 4 Dimensions of Minkowski Space-Time (explained in Chapter 17 of the Special Theory of Relativity, but inferred from the 1st chapter) from your monitor, not only to your eyeballs, but traveling across Minkowski Space-Time at the “speed of light” to strike every lighted surface of your room illuminating them to the inverse square luminescence of the Minkowski Space-Time Distance traveled (same as any other ordinary light bulb http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law ).

    As you look around your room at every illuminated surface, at the atomic level of about 250,000,000 atoms to the inch squared, is absorbing the photons and kicking electrons to a more energetic state which then collapse to reflect this Energy of light (originating from your monitor as the full spectrum of visible light frequencies) back out from every surface in your room at every possible angle (you can move around the room and observe), again, in tera-seconds-apart waves of trillions of photon gamma particles back through the Minkowski Space-Time Continuum which is your room. Every surface in your room, there, is like a reflective mirror for light Energy of the specific hue; saturation; brightness and gloss of that surface.

    You are just standing in the middle of all this gamma particle traffic going on all around you in the room you are observing! Illumination.

    We are constantly standing in an ocean of criss-crossing photon gamma particle waves that will bounce off and reflect (like billiard balls–we call this “glare”) as ambient background photon gamma particle waves to any experiment trying to shoot a single photon through this ambient background “noise.” Somebody forgot to point out this “noise” was in all their scientific experiments skewing their results; even Michelson-Morley. Just because you can’t see it with the “Naked Eye” doesn’t mean you do not have to account for this “noise” in your experiments. Turn off your lights and slip on some Night Vision Goggles to see how much ambient background gamma particle waves are bouncing around that weren’t accounted for in these experiments.

    Go to the kitchen and get a big white round bowl and hold it down by your waist so you can kind of parabolically (like a RADAR or TV antenna Dish) catch the kitchen light and reflect it up to your eye and get the angle right and you will see a “Fog” of light or “Glare.” You are looking at reflected “Standing Waves” of photon gamma particles 250,000,000 to the inch Cubed. You are looking at a soup of “light!”

    Most reported on “Quantum Theory” is just a G.I.G.O. (Garbage In, Garbage Out) mathematical account no different than the Ptolemy mathematical model for the Solar System that put the Earth at the center. Ptolemy’s math worked perfectly and was “right.” Then Copernicus came along and proved that Ptolemy’s mathematical model was GIGO incorrect. Ptolemy’s model was incorrect, but his math was right (GIGO).

    All CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery) are purposefully created imaginary mathematical models where the math works “Virtually” “right.” But that doesn’t mean what you are seeing in that Advertisement for the latest new car means you can jump a draw bridge and not completely destroy your “Real Car” suspension. The CGI mathematical model, computer mathematically plotted on your TV screen, looks “right,” but like Ptolemy it is incorrect GIGO marketing in “Reality.”

    I’ll save the part about why the alleged “Quantum Theory” of particles traveling forwards and backwards through Minkowski Space-Time is GIGO for another time.

    Keep in mind a Vacuum is not really empty if you can “see” through the Bell Jar. This means the vacuum is full of light traveling through the Bell Jar in photon gamma particle waves in every possible angle the same as light has been traveling in inverse square photon gamma particle waves between the Stars through Minkowski Space-Time for billions of Light Years. The Universe is a constant ocean of light.

    Just because you can’t “see” the constant streaming waves of light between your monitor and your eyes doesn’t mean there isn’t a constant stream of photon gamma particle waves coming to the Earth reflected off the Moon whether there is an observer standing there to perceive the particles/waves or not.

    If a light was turned on in a room and there was no anthropocentric scientist there to observe it, would it make a sight? Would it’s wave collapse to reflect the room in a mirror?

  2. “I’ll save the part about why the alleged “Quantum Theory” of particles traveling forwards and backwards through Minkowski Space-Time is GIGO for another time”

    Don’t save that for another time, I’d like to hear why you think that theory is garbage. It’s possible it is a bad theory, but a lot of unexplained phenomenon in quantum physics work if you run them backwards in time.

    In looking at the other things you posted, I would think that a gamma soup would cause more of a Brownian motion result from collisons, as apposed to one of two outcomes; either perfect waves or perfectly linear…but maybe I misread what you wrote.

  3. You forget there is a 3 hour difference and you are young and bright eyed and bushy tailed. So I’m making a cut & paste job explaining the impossibility of “Time Travel” which would have to be “Space-Time Continuum Travel.”

    “TWO FINGER TIME TRAVEL DEMO”

    B…

    Here’s one of my older pieces you might enjoy with me poking fun at Stephen Hawking, who for the record is not considered the smartest physicist since Albert Einstein except by his Publishers and college underclassmen Trekkies. Most working (not teaching) physicists don’t even rate Stephen Hawking in the Top 10 of the Twentieth Century.

    Jeffrey is a Professor at Rice University, in Houston, who has taken an interest in me as a case study because of my “credible” military and technical background. And I like screwing with the heads of the guys in the Physics Department the same as I do religious fundamental-ists.

    Just 2 fingers to prove “Time Travel” is impossible, just like it only takes 15 minutes to prove that the Bible isn’t the infallible “Word of God.” Except to Stephen Hawking and Pat Robertson.

    –D

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Dawson
    Date: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:11 PM
    Subject: Fwd: Two Finger Time Travel Demo & ET bipedal conundrum
    To: Jeffrey xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Here’s something you might have some fun with also with the boys in the Physics Department.

    I’ll drag this out when people are coming on Coast To Coast AM and will be talking about Black Holes, Worm Holes and Time Travel and bending “Space” like Space is as flat a plane as a piece of paper. Einstein didn’t just jump into Minkowski Space-Time as a co-ordinate system in Chapter 17 of his Special Theory of Relativity, he assumed it part of the description from the beginning of Special Relativity that we do live in the Volumes of 4 Dimensions. That’s part of basic RADAR theory of how we measure where your Holiday Jet is hanging in the sky in Space and Time with gamma particle reflected waves. RADAR theory is based on the Minkowski 4 Dimensional Continuum.

    Actually we are moving through Space-Time in 9 physical Dimensions (measurable magnitudes), not just 3 plus some magical dimension of “Time.” Time is the 1st Dimension upon which Width, Height and Depth are overlaid in Space because it even takes “Time” to contemplate (much so more to travel through in your Holiday Jet) the other 3 magnitudes of measurement in the Minkowski 4 Dimensional Space-Time model.

    You are viewing these very words, emanating as 250 million photons to the inch from your monitor across a Volume of Minkowski Space-Time and striking your eyeballs, and reacting to what you just read at about the same reaction speed as your hitting the brake pedal in your car as it travels through the Volumes of Time and Space.

    –D

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Dawson
    Date: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:50 PM
    Subject: Two Finger Time Travel Demo & ET bipedal conundrum
    To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    This is the Demo I wrote I’d sent Ian as an addendum about the problem with mathematical models where all math might work out on paper with perfectly good equivalencies and still be just as illusory as CGI. Ptolemy’s model of the Earth based Solar System mathematically worked fine but just didn’t happen to be correct.
    With just two fingers you can demonstrate the problem of Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking illustrating CGI models of black holes and worm holes as if “folded-space” exists on a flat 2 dimensional plane.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Dawson
    Date: Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:35 PM
    Subject: Two Finger Time Travel Demo
    To: ian xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Whenever you have a Guest or (open lines) caller that thinks worm holes and folded 2 dimensional space make for convenient “Time-travel,” try this little exercise.

    Take a finger on your right hand and hold it upright out in front of your chest, over across by your left shoulder and then move it slowly across in front of you to your right side. Now move your righthand (sic) finger back even with your left shoulder and do this again, but this time while circling it with a finger from your left hand all the way slowly across your chest to your right side again. Next time drop away your righthand and just allow your lefthand finger to travel in front of you from your left side slowly to your right side repeating its spiraling progress through space, and according to your watch through time.

    The first righthand finger represents the Sun moving through space-time (and we all just got older in time and aged) through the galaxy. The lefthand finger represents the Earth as it does not circle the Sun, but is describing a spiral as it follows its Star through Minkowski space-time, the mathematical model in which Einstein’s theory of special relativity is most conveniently formulated, named after German mathematician Herman Minkowski.

    Now if your right side represents where the Earth is in space-time today, and your left side represents where the Earth was in space-time at say Jesus’ birth, then in order to travel backwards in space-time would require all the energy to move the Earth, the Sun, the Moon, all the Planets, heck even the entire Milky Way and every other galaxy in the Universe back to where they were when the Earth was in space-time when Jesus was born. This would actually take more energy than the sum total of all the energy moving everything in the Universe at its Ambient Background Motion at this moment in space-time.

    Going forward ahead in “time travel” faster than the ambient background motion of the Universe presents the same energy problem so that whenever real working physicists (and not just teaching professors or TV celebrity “physicists” ) see “time machines” popping up in their equations they realize there is an error somewhere.

    And time is not some mysterious “fourth dimension,” it is the 1st magnitude of measurement in space (time) upon which the next 3 magnitudes of one massless point is measured to another massless point in width, height and depth as coordinate points projected upon (and to measure we all just got older in time and aged again, even as you read these lines) to describe a Volume of space-time.

    Time nor Direction ever move backwards. Each new motion in any Direction of vector within the Volume of Space-Time is only forward. When you drive from L.A. to San Francisco you are driving forward through Space-Time. When you return driving from San Francisco to L.A. you are driving forward through Space-Time. Space-Time is not “Out There” outside the Earth’s atmosphere “In Space.” Space-Time is right here between this word on the screen and your eyes. This “Here” is the Universe also.

    Let’s save the other physical Dimensions (measurable magnitudes) of the Space-Time Volumes of density, mass, cycles and frequencies for another Time.

Comments are closed.